Legal Opinion

Hershel v. University Hospital Foundation

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 15, 1980No. 53137PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARGRAVE, Justice.

Ray Hershel entered University Hospital for the purpose of correcting blood circulation anomalies by the application of an aorta femoral artery bypass procedure on December 30, 1976. During this procedure, a significant quantity of laparotomy pads were allowed to remain inside the decedent Ray Hershel’s abdomen. Twelve days later a second surgery was performed and these pads were removed, but the decedent’s condition continued to deteriorate until, on January 21, 1977, he died. Ruby Hershel, decedent’s surviving spouse, filed this action in tort for the wrongful death of her…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. City of Shawnee v. RoushSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. State Ex Rel. State Insurance Fund v. BoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Henry v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  4. Schrom Ex Rel. Schrom v. Oklahoma Industrial DevelopmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. James v. Trustees of Wellston TownshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Vanderpool v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. McCracken v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Neal v. DonahueSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Fehring v. State Insurance FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  5. Hammons v. Muskogee Medical Center AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API