Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 17, 1986No. 8512SC1170PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

The only issue that we must decide is whether the trial court committed reversible error in denying defendant’s motion to com pel the State to disclose the identity of the confidential informant. In support of his motion defendant relies upon Roviaro v. United States, 353 U.S. 53, 1 L.Ed. 2d 639, 77 S.Ct. 623 (1957). In Roviaro, petitioner was charged with violating the Narcotics Drug Import and Export Act by selling heroin to a confidential informant known only as “John Doe.” Petitioner was also charged with having knowingly transported heroin to be unlawfully imported. In…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Herman Russell McLawhorn III v. State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  3. State v. KetchieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. GilchristCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. ParksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. MackCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API