Legal Opinion

State v. Marshall

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1989No. 8826SC785PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

I

Defendant argues that his motion to suppress evidence was erroneously denied. Defendant asserts five bases for his argument that the search of .the house and car in the front yard was unlawful. First, defendant argues that there was no affidavit accompanying the application for a search warrant when it was presented to the magistrate as required by G.S. 15A-244. Second, defendant argues that even if the officers’ sworn statement in the application is taken into account, there was insufficient evidence for the magistrate to issue the search warrant. Third, defendant asserts that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. State v. ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. VickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. JackmonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  5. State v. WadeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API