State v. Mack
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STROUD, Judge.
*170Robert Mack, Jr. (“defendant”) appeals from a conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to sell or deliver, arguing that the trial court erred by denying his motion to disclose the identity of the State’s confidential informant. Because defendant failed to show that the circumstances of his case mandate disclosure of the confidential informant’s identity, we find no error in defendant’s trial.
I. Background
On 15 December 2009, defendant was indicted for possession of cocaine with intent to manufacture, sell, and deliver, and for selling cocaine, in violation of N.C. Gen.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Herman Russell McLawhorn III v. State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- Gonzalez Et Vir v. State Bar of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Heard v. HooksDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020