Legal Opinion

State v. Mack

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 2, 2011No. COA10-1020PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

*170Robert Mack, Jr. (“defendant”) appeals from a conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to sell or deliver, arguing that the trial court erred by denying his motion to disclose the identity of the State’s confidential informant. Because defendant failed to show that the circumstances of his case mandate disclosure of the confidential informant’s identity, we find no error in defendant’s trial.

I. Background

On 15 December 2009, defendant was indicted for possession of cocaine with intent to manufacture, sell, and deliver, and for selling cocaine, in violation of N.C. Gen.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. State v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Herman Russell McLawhorn III v. State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  5. Gonzalez Et Vir v. State Bar of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Heard v. HooksDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API