Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Arkansas Racing Commission

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 11, 2001No. 00-435PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W.H. “Dub” Arnold, Chief Justice.

The Court of Appeals certified this case for us to consider an issue of first impression, constitutional interpretation, and substantial public interest involving the construction of the Rules and Regulations of appellee Arkansas Racing Commission. Our jurisdiction is authorized pursuant to Ark. R. Sup. Ct. l-2(d) and l-2(b)(l), (3), (4), (5), and (6) (2000). Appellant, James D. Jackson, brings the instant appeal from a Pulaski County Circuit Court order affirming appellee’s decision disqualifying appellant’s horse, Valhol, from the Arkansas Derby run on April…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arkansas State Police Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Northwest Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Fayetteville Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  4. Ark. Racing Commission v. Hot Springs Kennel Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  5. D'Avignon v. Arkansas Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arkansas Professional Bail Bondsman Licensing Board v. OudinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board v. Pegasus Renovation Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Arkansas Soil & Water Conservation Commission v. City of BentonvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Arkansas State Racing Commission v. Wayne Ward, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board v. Pegasus Renovation Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API