Legal Opinion

D'Avignon v. Arkansas Racing Commission

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 31, 1983No. 82-99PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas M. Bramhall, Special Justice.

Felix D’Avignon appeals from a judgment affirming a decision of the Arkansas Racing Commission suspending his trainer’s license for sixty (60) days. On June 19, 1975, Stylish Kim, a dog trained by D’Avignon, placed first in the fourth race at Southland Greyhound Park in West Memphis, Arkansas. Following the race a routine urine sample was taken and sent to a laboratory for analysis. The Commission’s chemist reported that the analysis revealed the presence of caffiene and/or analog or derivative thereof in violation of Rule 1233 of the Rules and Regulations…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Maryland Racing Commission v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Ark. Racing Commission v. Hot Springs Kennel Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1960

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jackson v. Arkansas Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API