Legal Opinion

Turman v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1989No. 87-452, 87-453PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants, each found guilty after a bench trial of one count of sexual solicita tion, 1 now assert two grounds for reversal: (1) there was insufficient evidence adduced at trial to support their convictions, and (2) the trial judge erred in crediting the testimony of the arresting officer in part based on his familiarity with the officer’s credibility in other cases. We agree with appellants’ last contention, and reverse. 2

On the evening of February 26, 1987, appellants brought their car to a stop on the north side of the 1200 block of S Street, Northwest, across the street from where…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. McClain v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Glascoe v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Searcy Ex Rel. Schiro v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. HardwickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Murphy v. McCloudDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Belton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Tursio v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. In re J.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Burgess v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API