In Re The Parenting & Support Of C.t.

¶ 1 — Cherry Kay Thomas appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motion to vacate a permanent parenting plan that it entered after she did not appear for trial. She argues that the trial court abused its discretion by denying the motion to vacate the final order under CR 60(b)(1) when (1) her attorney filed a notice of intent to withdraw four days before trial and did not serve her, (2) the trial court entered a permanent parenting plan without sending proper notice of the trial date to her, (3) she did not receive notice of a default judgment, and (4) the trial court erred in not…