Legal Opinion

Prudential Property & Casualty Co. v. Erie Insurance

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1986No. Civ. A. No. 86-1798PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

NEWCOMER, District Judge.

I have before me in this action a motion by plaintiff for summary judgment. The motion was submitted on a stipulated set of facts. The summary judgment motion and the case essentially raise one issue: whether defendant properly disclaimed coverage for a permissive driver under a policy of insurance based on the driver’s refusal to cooperate in the preparation of the defense and the arbitration of the case against him. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiff’s motion will be denied. Because there are no factual issues which remain to be decided, I will…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conroy v. Commercial Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Cameron v. BergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Frank Et Vir v. NashSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Paxton National Insurance v. BrickajlikSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weschler v. CarrollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Atlantic States Insurance v. Hunt, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2005
  3. Mazer v. Frederick Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API