Legal Opinion

Frank Et Vir v. Nash

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 1949No. Appeal, 10PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Arnold, J.,

In this attachment execution the question involved is whether an insurance carrier in an automobile liability policy is relieved from indemnification when the insured does not promptly furnish suit papers to the insurer, regardless of whether the insurance carrier is prejudiced.

The appellant insurance company issued an automobile liability policy to Clarence A. Nash, whereby it was bound to pay all sums which the insured became obligated to pay, by reason of liability imposed by law for damages sustained by any person, caused by an accident arising out of the use of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morris v. Bender (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. McClellan Et Ux. v. MadontiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad v. St. Paul Mercury-Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Strickler v. HuffineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Municipality of San Juan v. Great American InsuranceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1986
  5. Ragland v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API