ITT Industries, Inc. v. BorgWarner, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.
This action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., for cost recovery at two superfund sites regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) is before the Court on the Bronson Defendants’ 1 motion for partial summary judgment and partial dismissal. For the reasons stated herein, the Bronson Defendants’ motion for summary judgment will be denied and their motion to dismiss will be granted.
I
Plaintiff ITT Industries, Inc. (“ITT”) filed this action for damages against…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Atlantic Research Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United Technologies Corporation v. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Akzo Coatings, Incorporated, and the O'Brien Corporation v. Aigner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. Ugi Utilities, Inc., Docket No. 04-2409-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Centerior Service Company General Electric Company Ashland Oil, Incorporated v. Acme Scrap Iron & Metal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Solutia, Inc. v. McWane, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2010
- Hobart Corp. v. Waste Management of Ohio, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- Hobart Corp. v. Waste Management of Ohio, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Tennessee v. Roane Holdings Ltd.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2011