Legal Opinion

Attoe v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1967PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.

While other issues are raised in the briefs of the parties,3 we find it unnecessary to consider *544any issue other than whether the two defendant insurance companies by their conduct have waived the defense of the no-action clauses contained in their policies.

Such no-action clauses usually provide that no action shall lie against the insurer until the amount of the insured’s obligation to pay shall have been finally determined either by judgment against the insured or by written agreement of the insured, the claimant, and the insurer. Thus a no-action clause is not an absolute bar to action…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nichols v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Pabst Brewing Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Somers v. Germania National Bank of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Davies v. J. D. Wilson Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Nolop v. SpettelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Misericordia Community HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. First National Bank Ex Rel. Huckleby v. Nor-Am Agricultural Products, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Shannon v. ShannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Milas v. Labor Ass'n of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Johnson v. Misericordia Community HospitalCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API