Legal Opinion

Everett v. Sanderson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 11, 1953No. 391PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.

The defendants assert primarily that the evidence of the plaintiffs does not suffice to show adverse possession for twenty years within the purview of G.S. 1-40, and that the action ought to have been involuntarily nonsuited on that ground in the trial court.

When the evidence is interpreted in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, it discloses these facts:

1. On 12 January, 1948, L. W". Everett executed a deed sufficient in form to convey the 210 acres to the plaintiffs in fee.

2. For at least thirty-five consecutive years antedating his deed, L. W. Everett put the 210 acres to the only…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Locklear v. . SavageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Hunt v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Spivey v. NewmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Williams v. . BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841
  5. Lipe v. Guilford National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Alexander v. . Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Carrow v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Mallet v. HuskeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. In Re the Will of KnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API