Legal Opinion

Heywood v. Ziol

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1962No. 6960PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment wherein the court below granted rescission of a renewal option contained in a lease and a recovery for unpaid rent. Plaintiffs, Edwin T. Ziol and his wife, at all times herein concerned have been the owners of real property located at 342 East Camelback. In 1954 these premises consisted of a lot approximately 60 by 137 feet on which a house was situated. On May 28, 1954, plaintiffs agreed to lease this property to defendants, David E. Heywood and his wife, for the purpose of conducting a real estate brokerage business. Hereinafter, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Olds Bros. Lumber Co. v. RushingArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Lamson v. Horton-Holden Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. McMillon v. Town of FlagstaffArizona Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Pipitone v. MandalaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  5. Cannon v. Arizona Game & Fish Commission Ex Rel. Attorney GeneralArizona Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hill-Shafer Partnership v. Chilson Family TrustArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Isaak v. Massachusetts Indemnity Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Lerner v. BrettschneiderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  4. First Medical Health Plan, Inc. v. CAREMARKPCS CARIBBEAN, INC.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010
  5. DVM Co. v. Stag Tobacconist, Ltd.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API