Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Manhattan Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 7, 1932No. 203PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The appeals in question are from three decrees in the suit at bar; the first giving leave to the plaintiff, Johnson, to sue receivers of the Manhattan Railway Company and the Interborough Railway Company appointed in another suit entitled American Brake Shoe Company v. Interborough Rapid Transit Company; the second, declaring void all decrees entered in that suit up to the time when the decree appealed from was entered, October 18th, 1932; the third, consolidating the two suits, F. Supp. 809.
On August 25, 1932, the attorney for the Interborough Rapid Transit Company…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
- Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Washington-Southern Navigation Co. v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Hall v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Nguyen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- MacAlister v. GutermaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Garber v. RandellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Timothy Capps v. Newmark Southern Region, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.