Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. Siegel

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbeetneb, J.

This is a motion by the city of New York for an order permitting it to deposit with the city treasurer the sum of $2,596.73, with interest thereon at 4% from May 6, 1952, as its proportionate share of a judgment recovered by the plaintiff, and directing the County Clerk to discharge such judgment as against the defendant city of New York.

On May 6, 1952, plaintiff entered a judgment against both defendants in the sum of $10,195.65 for personal injuries sustained by him as a result of the negligence of the defendants in the operation of their respective motor vehicles. The defendant Milton…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. John v. Andrews Institute for GirlsNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Parks v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. Sarine v. American Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. of IllinoisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  4. Parks v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Schultz v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Heves v. KershawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Dow v. BrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Bolkin v. LevyNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API