Legal Opinion

Bolkin v. Levy

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrancis X. Conlon, J.

As a result of the decision of the Appellate Division (5 A D 2d 824) and the infant plaintiff’s consent to a reduction of the verdict against Tidewater, the latter is liable for $16,500, plus interest and costs (Schultz v. United States Fidelity & Guar. Co., 201 N. Y. 230; Bernstein v. Siegel, 204 Misc. 750). Tidewater’s present motion, to the extent that it seeks to have the judgment entered against both defendants reduced to $16,500, is, accordingly, denied. Insofar as Tidewater seeks an order permitting it to make a deposit into court, the motion is likewise denied. No order of the court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schultz v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Bernstein v. SiegelNew York Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Melville Harris, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Leonard Massello and William Massello v. Standard Accident and Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  2. Melville Harris, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Leonard Massello and William Massello v. Standard Accident and Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API