Legal Opinion

Hammock v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1905No. 5802PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Huston, J., entered March 3, 1905, in favor of the defendant, upon sustaining a demurrer, to the amended complaint, dismissing an action for personal injuries sustained through a fall on a defective sidewalk.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal, rendered upon the order of the court sustaining a demurrer to appellant’s amended complaint. There- seems to ha no merit in the motion to dismiss. The allegations of the complaint were to the effect that the plaintiff, an elderly woman, while walking along a sidewalk upon the east side of J street in the city of Tacoma, about half way between South Eorty-third and South Eorty-first streets, on the 12th day of June, 1904, was severely injured through a fall caused by a broken and rotten plank in the walk. The situation is shown by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Born v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Bell v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Piper v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Loe Et Ux v. LenhardOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. City of East Chicago v. GilbertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Ellis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Wagner v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Lindquist v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1912

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API