Horton v. Stoll
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.
Action for damages for personal injuries. The injuries sustained by plaintiff Maxine Libby Horton, a pedestrian, were alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant automobile driver. The case went to trial before the court sitting with a jury. At the close of plaintiff’s case, defendant moved for a nonsuit on the grounds: (1) that plaintiff had failed to show defendant was negligent, and (2) that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. The court found in accord with defendant’s contention, withdrew the cáse from the jury, and granted a judgment of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burgesser v. Bullock'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Finkle v. TaitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Spring v. TawaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Bence v. Teddy's TaxiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mundy v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Fischer v. KeenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Taha v. FinegoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Hoppe v. BradshawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Flores v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.