Pearsall v. Tribal Council for Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon
Grand Ronde Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID B. THOMPSON, Associate Justice.
The principal issue in this case is the scope of the Tribal Court’s authority to review a legislative action by the Tribal Council. The case also presents an issue of whether the trial court had jurisdiction to hear a claim, filed by the complainant in an ethics proceeding under the now-repealed Tribal Ethical Standards Ordinance (TESO), that the hearing officer’s actions in that proceeding were unlawful.
1. BACKGROUND
Ed Pearsall, a member of the Tribe and of the Tribal Council, filed a complaint in the trial court against the Tribal Council and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State Ex Rel. La Follette v. StittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Gill v. HoadleyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003
- People v. EsayianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Synowski v. Confederated Tribes of Grand RondeGrand Ronde Court of Appeals · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.