Legal Opinion

Pearsall v. Tribal Council for Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon

Grand Ronde Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 2005No. A-04-07-002Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID B. THOMPSON, Associate Justice.

The principal issue in this case is the scope of the Tribal Court’s authority to review a legislative action by the Tribal Council. The case also presents an issue of whether the trial court had jurisdiction to hear a claim, filed by the complainant in an ethics proceeding under the now-repealed Tribal Ethical Standards Ordinance (TESO), that the hearing officer’s actions in that proceeding were unlawful.

1. BACKGROUND

Ed Pearsall, a member of the Tribe and of the Tribal Council, filed a complaint in the trial court against the Tribal Council and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. State Ex Rel. La Follette v. StittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Gill v. HoadleyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003
  4. People v. EsayianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Synowski v. Confederated Tribes of Grand RondeGrand Ronde Court of Appeals · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API