Legal Opinion
Hunter v. Sprint Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 22, 2006No. Civil Action 04-0376 (JDB)PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATES, District Judge.
Phillip Price II (“Price”) is the sole remaining plaintiff in what had been a Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) collective action brought by more than two-dozen individuals for unpaid overtime arising out of their employment with Sprint/United Management Company (“Sprint”). After reaching a settlement agreement with all plaintiffs other than Price, Sprint filed a motion for summary judgment contending that the evidence cannot support a finding of liability against Sprint and that, even if it could, Price cannot- establish damages because Sprint has paid…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Urnikis-Negro v. American Family Property ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Deloatch v. Harris Teeter, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Klein v. Torrey Point Group, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Guevara v. Ischia, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Russell v. Wells Fargo and Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.