Legal Opinion
Bopst v. Columbia Casualty Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided December 27, 1940No. Civil 756PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
At the trial of this case the defendant moved for a directed verdict which was rejected with the reservation of the question in accordance with Rule 50 of the new Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. These motions have been argued by counsel and I have given further consideration to the subject.
The nature of the suit, and a summary of the evidence at the trial, appears in the charge to the jury which has been transcribed .by the stenographer.
The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $3,243.17, and filed with their…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Equitable Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. McMillanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. City of South NorfolkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- United States v. FreelSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Atlantic Trust & Deposit Co. v. Town of LaurinburgCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Crusade v. Capital Transit Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Capital Transit Co. v. CrusadeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Glens Falls Insurance v. Wright Contracting Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1965
- Chester v. Schleisner Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1958
- De Jean v. Great American Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1954