Maryland Casualty Co. v. City of South Norfolk
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Circuit Judge.
This is the second appeal in a suit instituted in the court below to determine the liability of a surety under a contractor’s bond. Hudson & Scruggs, Inc., was the contractor, the city of South Norfolk, Va., was the obligee, and the Maryland Casualty Company was the surety. We shall refer t-o them hereafter as “the contractor,” “the city,” and “the surety,” respectively. The judge below referred the cause to a special master, who filed a report determining the amounts of the claims asserted by various materialmen under the bond. He reported that two general questions…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Thompson v. Maxwell Land Grant & Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Noonan v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Equitable Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. McMillanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- National Contracting Co. v. Hudson River Water Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Beers v. WolfSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Werner v. CarboCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Mary Kicklighter v. Nails by Jannee, Inc., Mary Kicklighter v. Nails by Jannee, Inc., and Third-Party v. Kay-See Dental Manufacturing Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Barnett v. JaspanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- White v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Ferguson v. Union Nat. Bank of Clarksburg, W. Va.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.