Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. City of South Norfolk

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 12, 1932No. 3239PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Circuit Judge.

This is the second appeal in a suit instituted in the court below to determine the liability of a surety under a contractor’s bond. Hudson & Scruggs, Inc., was the contractor, the city of South Norfolk, Va., was the obligee, and the Maryland Casualty Company was the surety. We shall refer t-o them hereafter as “the contractor,” “the city,” and “the surety,” respectively. The judge below referred the cause to a special master, who filed a report determining the amounts of the claims asserted by various materialmen under the bond. He reported that two general questions…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Maxwell Land Grant & Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Noonan v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Equitable Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. McMillanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. National Contracting Co. v. Hudson River Water Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Beers v. WolfSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Werner v. CarboCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  2. Mary Kicklighter v. Nails by Jannee, Inc., Mary Kicklighter v. Nails by Jannee, Inc., and Third-Party v. Kay-See Dental Manufacturing Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  3. Barnett v. JaspanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  4. White v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
  5. Ferguson v. Union Nat. Bank of Clarksburg, W. Va.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API