Legal Opinion
In Re Molz
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 21, 2005No. B172413PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
OPINION
We are called upon to determine whether a newspaper of general circulation that was established prior to 1923 may, without publishing notice, obtain an adjudication that it is a newspaper of general circulation for every city incorporated since 1923 within the county in which the newspaper is established. We conclude that doing so is inconsistent with applicable statutes and contrary to public policy.
The impact of becoming a newspaper of general…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- In Re De La OCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Knoll v. DavidsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Morton v. BroderickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. Bank of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ShrumArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Establishment of Eureka ReporterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Press Democrat v. Sonoma County Herald RecorderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Cal. Manufacturers & Tech. etc. v. State Water Resources Control Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Johnson v. Metropolitan News Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011