Legal Opinion

County of Los Angeles v. Surety Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 1984No. B001943PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANSON (Thaxton), J.

Plaintiff County of Los Angeles (County) sought and was awarded a summary judgment against defendant Surety Insurance Company of California (Surety) for $20,000 and interest, the amount due on a bail bond forfeiture (Pen. Code, §§ 1305, 1306). While the summary judgment is regarded as a “consent” judgment, it is now established that the judgment, a final determination of the rights of the parties, is appealable. (People v. Wilshire Ins. Co. (1975) 46 Cal.App.3d 216, 219 [119 Cal.Rptr. 917].)

The Statutory Scheme

Since the issues raised here are technical in nature,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. BelleciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Landrum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. United Bonding InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Edwards v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. Wilshire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. People v. American Contractors Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Poster v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. Allegheny Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. International Fidelity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. People v. Topa InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API