Legal Opinion

People v. Bankers Insurance Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 2016No. H040226PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MIHARA, J.

Appellant Bankers Insurance Co. (Bankers) appeals from the superior court’s order denying its motion to vacate the forfeiture of its bail bond. The bond expressly applied to “duly authorized amendments” to the complaint. Bankers contends that the court was required to vacate the forfeiture because the prosecution’s filing of an unauthorized amended complaint materially increased its risk under the bond. Respondent maintains that the court was not required to vacate the forfeiture because there was no statutory basis for doing so and the amended complaint did not materially…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. McReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. People v. Bankers InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. People v. International Fidelity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. People v. Western InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. People v. Lexington National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. International Fidelity Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. People v. Accredited Surety & CasualtyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  3. People v. American Surety CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. People v. Financial Casualty & Surety, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. People v. Financial Casualty & Surety, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API