People v. McReynolds
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County. The facts are stated in the opinion oí the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
Defendants were sureties on a bail bond conditioned for the appearance, etc., of one R. Lee McReynolds, who had been committed by a magistrate upon a charge of grand larceny. An information was thereafter duly filed in the superior court charging said *311R. Lee with said crime, tie appeared in said court on September 7, 1891, and was arraigned and pleaded “not guilty”; and the cause came on regularly for trial on. November 10, 1891, at 10 o’clock a. m., at which time the said R. Lee was present in court with his counsel. Thereupon on motion of the district attorney the court duly made an order…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reese v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- People v. StagerNew York Supreme Court · 1833
- Jackson v. WhartenbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
- State v. OrslerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- Medlin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876
3Cited by31 opinions
- People v. International Fidelity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Commonwealth v. THE STUYVESANT INSURANCE CO.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- People v. HandleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. DoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.