Legal Opinion
Balderson v. Seeley
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 5, 1910No. Docket No. 22PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from Montcalm; Davis, J. Bill by Perry Balderson against H. Lee Seeley to enjoin the removal of certain timber. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.
Complainant, being the owner of certain lands in Montcalm county, entered into an agreement with defendant in writing as follows:
“Fairplains, Mich., December 9, 1905.
“ This is to certify to an agreement entered into by and between H. L. Seeley of the township of Fairplains, State of Michigan, party of the first part, and Perry Balderson, of the township of Bushnell, State of Michigan, party of the second part; in which the party of the second part hereby sells and conveys to the party of the first part all of the timber now standing or lying, except the beech and hard maple; said beech and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Huron Land Co. v. DavisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Babka v. EldredWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- Nash v. DriscoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1864
- McCauley v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cooley v. Meridian Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Colleton Mercantile & Mfg. Co. v. GruberDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1925
- Kerschensteiner v. Northern Michigan Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- People v. BollingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Moore v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.