Westec Security Services, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
Westec Security Services, Inc. (“Westec”), the plaintiff in this matter, seeks to enforce a covenant not to compete against defendant Westinghouse Electric Corporation (“Westinghouse”). A bench trial on the merits has been completed, and what follow are my final findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Plaintiff is a corporation organized under California law, and its principal place of business is in that state. Defendant is a corporation organized under Pennsylvania law with its principal place of business in Pennsylvania. The amount in controversy,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. ChallonerSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. MartucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- John G. Bryant Co. v. Sling Testing & Repair, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Jacobson & Co. v. International Environment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Geisinger Clinic v. Di CuccioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Dock C-Food Ltd. v. Cherry (In Re Cherry)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Fogle v. ShahIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Unihealth v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Viad Corp. v. CordialDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.