Haas v. Brannon
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Commissioners’ Opinion, Division No. 6. Error from District Court, Ouster County ; Thomas A. Edwards, Judge. Action by W. I. Brannon against Leo Haas and I. G. Hanshaw to enjoin them from'changing the front of a building. Judgment 1 for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THOMPSON, O.
This action was commenced in the district court of Ouster county, Okla., by W. I. Brannon, defendant in error, plaintiff below, against Leo Haas and I. G. Hanshaw, plaintiffs in error, defendants- below, to enjoin them from changing the front of a building located in lots 21 and 22, in block 37, in the town of Clinton, Okla.
The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendants, as they appeared in" the lower court.
The petition alleges that plaintiff was the owner of. lot 21 and that defendant Leo Haas was the owner of lot 22, block 37, in the town of Clinton,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miller v. HoeschlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Bixby v. CravensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Giller v. WestIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Dudley v. MeggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3Cited by26 opinions
- Head v. McCrackenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Story v. HefnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Thomas v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Franks v. TylerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
- Frater Oklahoma Realty Corp. v. ALLEN LAUHON HDWE. CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.