Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rosemary Properties, Inc. v. McColgan

California Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1947No. S. F. 17263, 17264Published

1DissentTraynor, J.

I dissent.

The allowance of the deduction in section 8(h) of the-Bank and Corporation Franchise Tax Act is designed solely to pre*689vent double taxation of corporate income by this state. This section was drafted to cover dividends generally; it was not aimed particularly at dividends declared out of earnings or profits not included in the measure of the tax because of the percentage depletion deduction. Dividends out of earnings or profits not included in the measure of the tax on the dividend-declaring corporation because of the percentage depletion deduction are on the same footing as any…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Girouard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Butler Bros. v. McColgan, Franchise Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Cleveland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API