Legal Opinion
Richmond State Hospital v. Brattain
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 8, 2010No. 49A02-0908-CV-718PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRONE, Judge.
Case Summary and Issues"
From 1967 until 1998, the State of Indiana required some of its employees to work 40 hours per week while other employees in the same job classification were required to work only 37.5 hours per week for the same salary. The job classifications in which this occurred were referred to as "split classifications." Thus, the 40-hour-per-week employees in split classifications effectively received a lower hourly wage than their counterparts working 37.5 hours per week.
Employees who had been required to work 40 hours per week filed a class action lawsuit…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Collins v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- K.S. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Broussard v. Meineke Discount Muffler Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- GKN Co. v. MagnessIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Haas v. Pittsburgh National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richmond State Hospital v. BrattainIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Ron Shoemaker v. Indiana State Police DepartmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Kim v. KimAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- Richmond State Hospital v. BrattainIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010