Richmond State Hospital v. Brattain
Indiana Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In short summary, for over twenty-five years, the State of Indiana required certain employees to work 40-hour weeks while requiring certain other employees to work only 37.5-hour weeks. Though the employees received the same biweekly paycheck, the effect of the State’s policy was a disparity in actual hourly wage. The State ended the policy in 1993, but this class action was brought on behalf of those 40-hour employees.
Facts and Procedural History
The Court of Appeals did an exceptional job of detailing the extensive history of this litigation, as well as the history of the State’s work-hour…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Occidental Life Insurance v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Collins v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Bayh v. SonnenburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Ronald J. Cornetta v. The United States of America and John Lehman, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lester Sumrall v. LeSEA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
- Ron Shoemaker v. Indiana State Police DepartmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Indiana Gas Co. v. Indiana Finance AuthorityIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
- LeSEA Inc v. LeSEA Broadcasting CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
- Litsinger v. Forest River IncDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.