Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Kinkead

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 2000No. E024597PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RAMIREZ, P. J.

A jury convicted Michael Robert Kinkead of child endangerment (Pen. Code, § 273a, subd. (a))1 and found true the allegation that it resulted in the victim’s death (§ 12022.95). In bifurcated proceedings, Kinkead pled guilty to two counts of possessing methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)) and one count each of being under the influence of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11550, subd. (a)), possessing 28.5 grams or less of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352, subd. (b)), keeping a lost credit card (§ 485) and possessing methamphetamine…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. WaidlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. SargentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. SchwarzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. ValdezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hector Ramirez v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. People v. ValdezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. People v. ValdezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API