Legal Opinion

People v. Valdez

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2002No. S095660PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

In this case we address the mens rea for felony child abuse involving indirect infliction of harm. (Pen. Code, § 273a, subd. (a).) Consistent with a long line of decisional authority, the jury was instructed that felony child endangerment could be committed if defendant Eva Valdez acted with criminal negligence. However, the Court of Appeal interpreted the statute differently, concluding a defendant must purposefully place the child in a hazardous situation, while possessing a subjective awareness of this risk. It therefore reversed defendant’s conviction. We reaffirm criminal…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. ColantuonoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. PennyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Williams v. GarcettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. People v. SalasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Stark v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. People v. RobertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. B.M. (In re B.M.)California Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Hector Ramirez v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API