Legal Opinion

Hector Ramirez v. Loretta E. Lynch

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 20, 2016No. 08-72896PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAEZ, Circuit Judge:

Hector Giovanni Ramirez petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Ap- peak’s (“BIA”) decision that his conviction under California Penal Code section 273a(a) for felony child abuse constitutes a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 16(a) and (b) and therefore qualifies as an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F). We conclude that section 273a(a) is not a categorical crime of violence and is not divisible. We thus agree with Ramirez that his conviction does not constitute an aggravated felony, and grant the petition and remand.

I

A

Ramirez is a native…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. Paul ParnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Jose Valdivia-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. BellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
  4. Sazar Dent v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. Keith Studhorse, IICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API