Legal Opinion

Citizens' Investment Co. v. Armer

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 15, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). The correct-

ness of the decree of the chancery court depends upon the construction to be placed upon that part‘of the deed from Alex Armer and his wife to Claude Armer which is copied in onr statement of facts and which need not be repeated here. That mineral deed was executed on the 23d day of June, 1922. At that time there was a mineral lease on the land in favor of Fred Mellor which had been executed by Alex Armer and his wife on the 17th day of June, 1922. By the terms of that lease it was to run for five years from the date thereof, or as long as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dempsey v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. Jackson v. LadySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. McDill v. MeyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  4. Georgia State Savings Ass'n v. DearingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  5. Cummins Bros. v. Subiaco Coal Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wynn v. Sklar & Phillips Oil CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Anderson-Tully Co. v. MurphreeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
  3. Paddock v. VasquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Mason v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  5. Paddock v. VasquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API