Legal Opinion

Paddock v. Vasquez

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 31, 1953No. Civ. 19747Published

1Opinion of the Court

122 Cal.App.2d 396 (1953)

J. HOWLAND PADDOCK, Respondent,

v.

LEANDRO VASQUEZ et al., Appellants.

California Court of Appeals.

Dec. 31, 1953.

Burke, Williams & Sorensen and Reynolds, Painter & Cherniss for Appellants.

John C. Gillham for Respondent.

VALLEE, J.

Plaintiff brought this action for a declaration of his rights under a mineral deed, and dependent on the determination of his rights to recover money due.

On January 15, 1937, Anselmo M. Vasquez and Bertha R. Vasquez, being the owners of a parcel of realty, entered into an oil and gas lease of the realty with Ohio Oil Company, as lessee, by which…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Woodbine v. Van HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Richardson v. HartTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Hoffman v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  5. Koenig v. Calcote Et Ux.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1946

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API