Legal Opinion

Rheinecker v. Forest Laboratories

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided July 16, 1993No. C-1-91-543PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER

SPIEGEL, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion to Reconsider (doc. 61), the Motion by Amici Curiae for Leave to File Brief (doc. 62), Motion to Add Additional Party as Amici Curiae (doc. 65), the Defendants’ Response (doc. 66), and the Plaintiffs Reply (doe. 71). As a preliminary matter, we hereby GRANT the motions for leave to file briefs Amici Curiae, for the purposes of this motion only, and accordingly consider those documents in ruling on this motion.

The Plaintiff has moved this Court to reconsider our Order…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Phung v. Waste Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Helmick v. Cincinnati Word Processing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Tulloh v. Goodyear Atomic Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kulch v. Structural Fibers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Abbamont v. Piscataway Township Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  3. Griswold v. Fresenius USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
  4. Kulch v. Structural Fibers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Gall v. Quaker City Castings, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API