Legal Opinion

Causer v. Mandarino

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 1985No. 198 and 199 Pittsburgh, 1983PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

This appeal originates from an Order issued by the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County sitting en banc. The Order mandated that the Commonwealth, through the State Real Estate Commission (the “Commission”) establish a complete list of claimants against the defendant licensee, Robert A. Mandarino, and also that the Commonwealth file a proposed schedule of distribution establishing the maximum amount recoverable by each individual claimant in accordance with the court’s decision.

These matters arose from the activities of defendant, formerly licensed by the state as a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. HartliebSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Bley v. Com., Dept. of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Glencrest Realty Co. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Cartex Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. CROSBY BY CROSBY v. SultzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Seay v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Fleck v. TimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. AyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API