Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ayers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 14, 1987No. 567PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, President Judge:

This is an appeal by permission of the court from an interlocutory order in the Court of Common Pleas of Potter County denying the Commonwealth’s motion to admit the appellant into the Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition (“ARD”) program. We affirm.

Appellant, Andy Ayers, was charged with corruption of a minor, indecent assault, harassment and furnishing liquor to a minor. Ayers persuaded the 14 year old victim to come to a beer party at 5:30 a.m. However, when she arrived she discovered the party had ended and only Ayers was present. He allegedly provided her with…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Bertera's Hopewell Foodland, Inc. v. MastersSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Bertera's Hopewell Foodland, Inc. v. MastersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Causer v. MandarinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. BurdgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChilcoteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. PaulSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. StrangesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. PerezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. GanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API