Legal Opinion

Redevelopment Authority v. Associated Retail Stores, Inc.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1979No. Appeal, No. 2580 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wuuunson, Jr.

In this eminent domain case, the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Philadelphia (Authority) appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County which denied the Authority’s post-trial motions. We affirm.

On May 21, 1970 the Authority filed a Declaration of Taking condemning the premises 833-39 Market Street. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Company (Fidelity Trust) was the fiduciary owner of the premises. The prime tenant was Associated Retail Stores, Inc. (Associated), which operated in the three internally connected buildings a retail…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Singer v. Oil City Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. North Side Deposit Bank v. Urban Redevelopment Authority of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Redevelopment Authority v. PulakosCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Redevelopment Authority v. DriscollCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. MilneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  2. Robzen's Inc. v. US Dept. of HousingDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Lang v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Marx Stationery & Printing Co. v. Redevelopment Authority of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Purcell v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API