Legal Opinion

Marx Stationery & Printing Co. v. Redevelopment Authority of Philadelphia

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 1996PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Judge.

Marx Stationery & Printing Company, Penn Dry Goods Company, India Overseas Traders, Inc., Susan Garment Co., Lema Novelty Co., Inc., P & S Fabrics, Supreme Suitcase & Bag Co., Irving Wenger Co., Ber-bén Uniforms, Inc., Berben Insignia, and S & S Hat Co. (hereinafter collectively, tenants), appeal and the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Philadelphia (RDA), cross-appeals from the February 3,1995 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, which denied both parties’ motions for post-trial relief.

I. Factual and Procedural History

These consolidated appeals arise…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Singer v. Oil City Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Lira v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Hughes v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. McCann v. Amy Joy Donut ShopsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McGaffic v. Redevelopment Authority of New CastleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. In re MackeyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Hagan v. East Pennsboro TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. In re Condemnation by the Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, of Right of Way for State Route 0079, Section W10Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Linefsky v. Redevelopment Authority of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API