Legal Opinion
Wade McNeil v. Fred A. Seaton, Individually and as Secretary of the Interior
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 22, 1960No. 15351PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DANAHER, Circuit Judge.
This case involves appellant’s claim that he has wrongfully been denied *933rights accruing to him under the Taylor Grazing Act1 and the Federal Range Code.2 The Secretary on June 19, 1956 promulgated a Special Rule 3 the effect of which was to reduce appellant’s claimed preferential grazing privileges on the federal range and to permit grazing by other users allegedly not entitled to grazing preferences. Cross motions for summary judgment were considered by the District Court where judgment was entered for the Secretary and appellant’s complaint was dismissed. Basically…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Stark v. WickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Tennessee Electric Power Co. v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Hatahley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Brooks v. DewarSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Burfenning v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Grant M. Acton v. United States v. W. Clifton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Duesing v. UdallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- American Colloid v. Interior SecretaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Chester Fuller and Maxine Fuller (939.62 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situatedin Yuma and Mohave Counties, State of Arizona)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- McNeil v. LeonardDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.