Grant M. Acton v. United States v. W. Clifton v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
VON DER HEYDT, District Judge.
This action was originated by the United States, appellee herein, in condemnation of certain property interests under Title 40 U.S.C. Section 257, and Title 10, U.S.C. Section 2663. The appeal is taken from the District Court’s summary judgment entered November 3, 1966, declaring that the cancellation by the United States of appellants’ revocable uranium prospecting permits was not a taking of property under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States for which the United States must compensate appellants.
The facts are these:
The Congress, seeking…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Federal Lands Legal Consortium v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Hubbard v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Ken McMaster v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Bayshore Sew. Co. v. Dep't. of Env., NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Lee v. North Dakota Park ServiceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.