Legal Opinion

Duesing v. Udall

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 30, 1965No. Nos. 17358, 17403-17409PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:

These are appeals from orders granting summary judgment to appellee, Secretary of the Interior, and dismissing the complaints of appellants. The lawsuits sought to establish the invalidity of the decision of the Secretary of the Interior closing the southern half of the Kenai National Moose Range in Alaska for oil and gas leasing, in consequence of which appellants’ noncompetitive applications were rejected. We affirm.

The Moose Range was created in 1941 by Executive Order No. 8979, 6 F.R. 6471, by which approximately two million acres of the public domain were set…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. National Lead Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Boesche v. UdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  5. James W. Haley v. Fred A. Seaton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  2. Udall v. Washington, Virginia & Maryland Coach Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  3. C. Burglin v. Rogers C. B. Morton, as the Secretary of the Interior of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. BerklundDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1978
  5. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior v. Washington, Virginia and Maryland Coach Company, Inc., D.C. Transitsystem, Inc., Intervenor. United States of America v. Washington, Virginia and Maryland Coach Company, Inc., D.C. Transitsystem, Inc., Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, and Virginiastate Corporation Commission, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API