Legal Opinion
Banister v. Marinidence Opco, LLC
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 21, 2021No. A159815Published
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 4/30/21 Modified and Certified for Pub. 5/21/21 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE MAUREEN BANNISTER, A159815 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Marin County Super. Ct. No. MARINIDENCE OPCO, LLC, et al., CIV1804315) Defendants and Appellants. Marinidence Opco, LLC, Providence Group, Inc., and Tommy Siqueiro, III (collectively “Marinidence”) challenge the trial court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration. Because we conclude their appeal lacks merit, we affirm. BACKGROUND A. On a petition to compel arbitration,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Ruiz v. Moss Bros. Auto GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Espejo v. Southern California Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Luxor Cabs, Inc. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018