Legal Opinion
State v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided July 22, 2005No. A-8756PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
The defendant in this case, Barry Anthony Anderson, was arrested for a robbery. After the police advised him of his Miranda rights, he invoked his right to counsel. Anderson remained in jail because he was unable to make bail.
During their continued investigation of this robbery, the police learned that Anderson might have been involved in a separate robbery/homicide. 1 The police enlisted a friend of Anderson’s, Eric Colvin, to visit Anderson in jail and try to get him to make incriminating statements about this separate criminal episode. Anderson was eventually…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Arizona v. RobersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Slwooko v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
- Halm v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Slwooko v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006