Legal Opinion
Slwooko v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided July 21, 2006No. A-8747PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
Bernice Slwooko appeals her conviction for second-degree murder. At Slwooko’s trial, the State introduced evidence of Slwooko’s self-incriminatory statements to the police. In this appeal, Slwooko argues that her statements should have been suppressed; Slwooko contends that the police obtained the statements in violation of her rights under Miranda v. Arizona.1
In our previous decision in this case, Slwooko v. State, Alaska Memorandum Opinion No. 5003, 2005 WL 2093690 (August 31, 2005), we remanded this case to the superior court for additional findings on two…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MorriseyMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. CastilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- People v. VasquezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- Slwooko v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006