Legal Opinion
Castillo v. Ingram
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided February 5, 2015No. Case No. 2:14-cv-0332-GMN-PALPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 21), filed by Defendants Kevin Ingram, David Spencer, Mark Zane, James Nadeau, James Colbert and Robert Uithoven'in their official capacities. Plaintiff Troy Castillo filed a Response, (ECF No. 23), to which Defendants replied, (ECF No. 24).
I. BACKGROUND
This case centers upon constitutional challenges to several provisions of Nevada’s licensing scheme for private investigators. (Compl., ECF No. 1). Plaintiff Troy Castillo is a resident of California and a twenty-nine year veteran of the Palm…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Davis v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Susan B. Anthony List v. DriehausSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Wolfson v. BrammerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.